Have you ever played those fill-in crossword puzzles? You have to solve the puzzle by filling in the diagram with answer words reading across and down. At first the alphabets are all mixed together but as you fill in words in one direction, words in the other direction are automatically filled and soon the crowd of words read sentences with messages for the gamer. Life is like a crossword puzzle sometimes. The things that are happening around you, don't make so much sense, like they have no connection to the other, i.e. the creation of Israel, the invasion of Lebanon, dismantling of Pakistan, the protests in Egypt, the punishment of Libya etc - until you put them together. When you fill everything in its place, then you realize how one event is intertwined with the other. Though the events may be months or years apart, they are part of the same scheme.
I didn't always believe in conspiracy theories until I read it as a fact in my political science textbook. Remember the Arrivals series everyone was on about a little while back? Yes, the same Arrivals about Dajjal and his symbols and system discussed in great detail with this horrid background music that haunts you in your dreams if you hear it in all 50 episodes. Initially Arrivals made sense to me because I am familiar with music and the affects of backtracking/backmasking. My brother and I used to play with audacity, MP3, WMP and other Audio softwares so I know how it works. I believe that yes music videos can be a medium to summon/appease the demons because dance was always a form of pagan worship and Allah says in the Qur'an that the pagans do not worship idols but they worship/please Shaytan through those ideals. So no stretching of truth here. Next Arrivals showed the pyramid formation on buildings tops and one-eye images on everything from cartoons to carrot packaging, from the Pope's ring to the police badges. Again I believe as well because I see buildings with pyramid roof configuration. Almost every insignia on clothes, every stamp on food packs, the logo of every company and firm today is the image of one-eye. Most people who have eyes will agree. Then comes the jargon over "one world government." Is it only a conspiracy? Are some Muslims just paranoid and crying 'Islamaphobia' all the time? Not unless you study politics, no!
I took Global Politics this year with a German Prof. A large portion of our textbook was dedicated to International relations theory, a body of literature that sekes to explain the nature of the international system and the behaviour of the actors within it. This discipline includes international security (study of conflict and war and attempts to control/prevent it), international political economy (study of trade, finance, foreign debt and underdevelopment etc), and international organizations (study of of institutes such as the UN which focus on cooperation and international law between states and regimes).
My course focused on three political theories, idealism, realism, and liberalism. Although each theory is different from the other, founded by different philosophers for different reasons, years apart from each other, all three arrive at the same conclusion for world peace. Guess which one? Yes you better believe it, ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT! I would laugh if it was a joke but its not. Its not even a coincidence so y'all better start losing sleep over this.
Political idealism emerged in Europe in the 16th century. Writers such as G. Lowe Dickinson, Alfred Zimmern, Norman Angell, James T. Shotwell and US President Woodrow Wilson were all idealist thinkers and promoters. They believed that human nature is essentially good but since evil is innate to humanity, war is inevitable. So to prevent war, idealists propose to eliminate all "bad" institutions, states and structures that are the root cause of evil. Idealists believe in an international organization that would enforce one law and help social progress. After WW1 Idealist Woodrow Wilson proposed Fourteen points which lead to the creation of League of nations. It compromised of an assembly of 6 nations - Britain, France, Italy, Japan, Germany and the Soviet Union. From 1920 - 1939 these nations had absolute autonomy over the entire world. They initiated many military conflicts and conquests in various regions in guise of peace. They imposed arms control in 1922 to limit the arms of other nations whilst building their own fleets of battleships and aircrafts to hundreds and thousands. Keep in mind that its the same idealistic League of Nations (now known as the UN) that axed the Muslim Khilafah into small combatant states and sold Palestinian land to the Jews.
Realism developed as an International Relations' perspective after WW11. It views humans as self-interested creatures. The believe that political power only corrupts humans further. So they endeavour for a a world government or police force that would secure the world from anarchy. Early exponents of political realism E.H. Carr, Hans J. Morgenthau, Kenneth W. Thompson and Reinhold Niebuhr were inspired by Niccolo Machiavelli, Thomas Hobbes, Thucydides, and Sun Tzu. So its but natural that they emphasis the importance of power and self-interest above all other considerations. For realists, power should be the primary interest of the state an interest should be predominant in power. What does that mean? Realists see power as a zero-some game. For one state to gain power, they think other states must necessarily lose power. In other words, for a state to become the superpower, it must control all other states in the world. Hence, the realists key objective is to enhance and secure their power. By commanding the world they think they will bring it peace and order. Yes, this is a one-world-government rant. For example structural realist, Kenneth Waltz said that "anarchy is not complete chaos or absence of law but rather the lack of a central authority or government capable of enforcing rules." The realists have an infamous saying, "Si vis pacem, parabellum - if you want peace, prepare for war." Meaning, there will be war until a one-world-government is established.
Liberalism is the mother of all evil. Think about it, what does liberalism initially stand for? Freedom? You can have any religion or no religion, be whatever you want (male, female, both, or change your gender surgically), kill our children (abortion), extort money (interest based businesses), wear whatever you want or nothing at all, go wherever you want, say whatever you want, eat/drink whatever you want and the government will protect you! Liberalism is license to sin. Disobey Allah as if there is no Day of Judgment and call it your "right". SubhanAllah! But morals aside, liberalism believe increased trade, financial, social and communications flow around the world. This sounds like globalization doesn't it? It is. What globalization does is that it makes borders permeable and government powerless to multinational corporations (MNCs) and NGOS that not only control your culture, you natural resources but also the employment rates, GDP, essentially the entire economy. Take the European Union for an example. First they shared a few trade agreements and now from Belgium to Greece, they are a single state with a single government, flag and currency. Along with trade and culture, liberalists also maintain that the key to global stability is the spread of Western-style liberal democracies. Of course its no surprise there is a wave of protests plaguing the Middle East and Pakistan.
Think about it. All the clothes that we (Muslims living back home) wear, foods we love, cars we drive, songs that we bop our heads to (yes music is very haram!) are either Italian, Australian, US, French or Russian. Is scary isn't it? We speak their language, go to their schools, work in their companies, watch their media. We are under so much of their influence that we unconsciously think the same way they do, share their values and have become eager to adopt their government and laws. What's wrong with the Shari'a law? you ask a Muslim from Egypt or Jordan or Lebanon. Why not adopt the Islamic culture? Either they will say its too folkloric or that they want to embrace both, be Islamic and democratic (wear tight jeans and tank-top with hijab, send kids to Islamic school with Miley Cyrus backpack and gelatin cookies for lunch, buy a house on interest and do Qur'an khatam ni it, work only on cash to avoid paying taxes and collect full unemployment benefits from government). Go to any part of the world know, English is the most common language, coke is the most drank beverage and Angelina Jolie/Brad Pitt the most popular celebrities. All this is a deliberate indoctrination to one-way-of-thinking. Btw, from 1966 Coca-Cola has been a staunch supporter of Israel. In 1997 the govt. of Israel honoured Coca-cola at the Israeli Trade Awards Dinner for its continued support of Israel for over 30 years and for refusing to abide by the Arab League boycott of Israel. In 2002, Coke announced a new plant on the stolen Palestinian land at Kiryat Gat. So next time you pay $2.00 to purchase your coke can, just think what you are doing the Palestinian kids >_< And ah Angelina Jolie is Illuminati ;) Yes I know, she was in Pakistan recently, helping the poor flood victims whilst wearing a black-magic-priestess-like robe as a occult graphic sign/ritual? Oh its possible. I won't say no.
Well, this is politics for you. Marxism is another political theory but we know how that ended in Russia so I guess we don't have to worry about that one. As for Idealism, Realism and Liberalism - like I said, start losing some sleep. Think about what kind of a future you want your "Muslim" children to have. Can their imaan survive the one world government? Can you live with yourself today knowing that you did nothing?
If you are still not convinced or want to know more, check out the following lectures:
The US, One World Government and Muslims
The US control of money and organized poverty of Muslims
The CIA agenda and Muslims
No comments:
Post a Comment